MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204835085 · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00213-9

Access to palliative care: the primacy of public health partnerships and community participation

2021· article· en· W3204835085 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jason Mills, Julian Abel, Allan Kellehear, Manjula Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Public Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalliative carePublic healthPublic relationsSociologyNursingPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oct 9, 2021, marks World Hospice and Palliative Care Day. The 2021 theme, Leave No One Behind—Equity in Access to Palliative Care, is especially pertinent given the unprecedented effects of COVID-19. In support of this theme, we propose a re-imagining of palliative-care access to promote more equitable outcomes through public-health partnerships that prioritise community development and participation in end-of-life care. Palliative care is widely recognised as a public-health concern, with both structural and social determinants of health affecting health inequalities for disadvantaged populations across high-income and low-income countries.1Kellehear A Compassionate cities: public health and end-of-life care. Routledge, Oxford2005Google Scholar, 2Abel J Kellehear A Karapliagou A Palliative care-the new essentials.Ann Palliat Med. 2018; 7: S3-14Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar For low-income countries, palliative care development has become a key focus to promote equitable access, with the International Palliative Care Initiative producing a roadmap to guide development and expansion of palliative-care provision in resource-constrained countries.3Callaway MV Connor SR Foley KM World Health Organization public health model: a roadmap for palliative care development.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018; 55: S6-13Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar However, disadvantaged groups are also found in resource-rich countries—Indigenous peoples, LGBTQI+ communities, and those incarcerated or homeless, in particular. A review of hospice-patient care in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada found that older people (aged ≥85 years), ethnic minorities, people with non-cancer illnesses, and people living in rural locations or areas of social deprivation had unequal access to palliative care.4Tobin J Rogers A Winterburn I et al.Hospice care access inequalities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021; (published online Feb 19.)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002719Crossref PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar But these findings merely confirm what many have observed for quite some time; the reality that palliative-care service provision reaches only a minority of those who need palliative care and inequities of access substantially affect those from diverse communities. Viewed through a population-health lens, present efforts to promote equity and access to palliative care are limited in that professional service provision models are increasingly unable to cope with demand to meet population needs.2Abel J Kellehear A Karapliagou A Palliative care-the new essentials.Ann Palliat Med. 2018; 7: S3-14Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar, 3Callaway MV Connor SR Foley KM World Health Organization public health model: a roadmap for palliative care development.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018; 55: S6-13Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar Compounding this have been ongoing recommendations to improve access that either problematise needs as community deficits to be filled by services or focus on the expansion and marketing of, or professional development within, service providers.5Abel J Kellehear A Mills J Patel M Access to palliative care reimagined.Future Healthc J. 2021; (published online Sept 23.)https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0040Crossref Google Scholar Unfortunately, there has been little by way of new approaches to what is an old problem. Collectively, this represents both a lack of imagination on integration of services with community and a failure to prioritise equity of access. Palliative-care providers adopting new public health approaches, or actions framed around health-promoting palliative care, will be best-equipped to tackle the challenges of equity and access for diverse populations. This is largely because these approaches, informed by the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, offer empowerment and respect the ability of communities to identify strengths and needs, set priorities, and identify goals or strategies within local contexts of provision and access to palliative care.1Kellehear A Compassionate cities: public health and end-of-life care. Routledge, Oxford2005Google Scholar, 2Abel J Kellehear A Karapliagou A Palliative care-the new essentials.Ann Palliat Med. 2018; 7: S3-14Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar End-of-life care is everyone's responsibility and most of the care provided towards the end of life is given by family, friends, and community members rather than solely by health professionals.6Kellehear A Compassionate communities: end-of-life care as everyone's responsibility.QJM. 2013; 106: 1071-1075Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar By community, we mean not merely community services or volunteers but members of neighbourhoods, faith groups, workplaces, schools, local government agencies, as well as sporting clubs, and cultural organisations such as galleries and museums. Death, dying, loss, and caregiving are experiences that occur within these kinds of community contexts, each providing love and support, practical care, policies for support, or educational experiences.5Abel J Kellehear A Mills J Patel M Access to palliative care reimagined.Future Healthc J. 2021; (published online Sept 23.)https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0040Crossref Google Scholar Therefore, it is in partnership with these elements within communities that we can provide support towards understanding and promoting equity in access to palliative care across diverse populations. The public-health practice of community development has proven to be effective and cost-effective in health care,7O'Mara-Eves A Brunton G McDaid D et al.Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis.Public Health Res. 2013; : 1Crossref Google Scholar while showing a clear commitment to equity as well as the inclusion of meaningful participation and empowerment. As outlined by WHO,8WHOCommunity participation in local health and sustainable development: approaches and techniques. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2002https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/107341Date accessed: September 25, 2021Google Scholar through recognition of community assets and respect for community-defined priorities, community development empowers and enables social networks to identify shared concerns and engage in participatory action to address them. In this way, public-health approaches to palliative care involve building community capacity and participation by working with communities rather than attempting to build it for them.5Abel J Kellehear A Mills J Patel M Access to palliative care reimagined.Future Healthc J. 2021; (published online Sept 23.)https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0040Crossref Google Scholar Importantly, this approach does not preclude health services from initiating community development programmes, as reflected in compassionate communities models, which help services transcend entrenched boundaries that exclude or limit care.2Abel J Kellehear A Karapliagou A Palliative care-the new essentials.Ann Palliat Med. 2018; 7: S3-14Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar Strengthened community action that is supported by inherent community assets such as social capital and compassion, together with clinical expertise and empowerment from health services to support death literacy and personal skills for end-of-life care, can transform disadvantaged communities into compassionate communities; everyday settings in society where citizens from diverse groups can readily access and provide care through active partnerships with palliative care services.2Abel J Kellehear A Karapliagou A Palliative care-the new essentials.Ann Palliat Med. 2018; 7: S3-14Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar, 6Kellehear A Compassionate communities: end-of-life care as everyone's responsibility.QJM. 2013; 106: 1071-1075Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar, 9Bollig G Brandt Kristensen F Wolff DL Citizens appreciate talking about death and learning end-of-life care—a mixed-methods study on views and experiences of 5469 last aid course participants.Prog Palliat Care. 2021; 29: 140-148Crossref Scopus (6) Google Scholar, 10Mills J Rosenberg JP Bollig G Haberecht J Last aid and public health palliative care: towards the development of personal skills and strengthened community action.Prog Palliat Care. 2020; 28: 343-345Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar Amidst longstanding inequalities in access to hospice and palliative care, if equity in access to palliative care is to be achieved it must be understood that equality of service provision for diverse populations will not necessarily equate to equity in health outcomes, as health inequities are context-bound and socially determined. Lying at the heart of inequitable access to palliative is a failure to recognise that diverse communities might have many strengths in the ways they support their dying. Palliative-care services often do not recognise these strengths and might make common assumptions about needs that do not match the wishes or social context of diverse communities. Following a critical review of common recommendations for increasing access to palliative care,5Abel J Kellehear A Mills J Patel M Access to palliative care reimagined.Future Healthc J. 2021; (published online Sept 23.)https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0040Crossref Google Scholar we suggest the first step towards equity in access is to explore and appreciate existing community strengths. Then the next step is, in partnership, finding out and offering the kind of support that members of diverse communities would like, to complement those strengths. Central to these steps is the growing need to strengthen community action and create supportive environments, as supported by the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. In re-imagining access to palliative care to promote more equitable outcomes, palliative care services must appreciate the primacy of public health partnerships and community participation. We declare no competing interests. Community-based participatory research in palliative care: a social justice imperativeWe appreciate Jason Mills and colleagues’ Comment in The Lancet Public Health on public health partnerships and community participation.1 The palliative care field could benefit from using community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to ensure provision of equitable care and address the social determinants of health amid serious illness, particularly for vulnerable and excluded groups. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.755
GPT teacher head0.564
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Public HealthSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207