MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204860024 · doi:10.1063/5.0055828

Self-organization of pure electron plasma in a partially toroidal magnetic-electrostatic trap: A 3D particle-in-cell simulation

2021· article· en· W3204860024 on OpenAlexaff
M. Sengupta, S. Khamaru, R. Ganesh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToroidPhysicsPlasmaElectronToroidal and poloidalMagnetic fieldAtomic physicsElectric fieldMechanicsComputational physicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics of a pure electron plasma magnetically confined in a partial toroidal trap is investigated using 3D3V PIC simulation. In particular, a toroid having a rectangular meridian, a tight aspect ratio of 1.6, and a 3π/2 toroidal domain is considered. Externally applied negative end-plug potentials electrostatically seal off the toroidal ends of the device for the confined electron cloud. A homogeneous square-toroidal segment of pure electron plasma is loaded in the middle of the trap. Strong non-uniform sheared poloidal flow reshapes the square cross section into 00an elliptical profile with symmetric closed contours of density peaking in the center. On the toroidal midplane, the plasma gets shaped into a crescent by the opposing dispersing and confining forces of the self-electric field and the end-plug fields, respectively. Density inside the crescent falls symmetrically from the middle to the two tapered ends. The self-reorganization of the loaded square-toroidal segment into an “elliptic-crescent” is completed within a time scale of ∼0.1μs. The cloud then starts to engage in poloidal orbits of the fundamental (toroidal) diocotron mode. The poloidal orbit’s time period is ∼2μs. The first orbit is turbulent and incurs significant electron losses (∼30%) to a particular segment of the poloidal boundary. Subsequent orbits are dynamically stable with a compression–expansion cycle of the cloud as it moves in an out of strong magnetic fields on the poloidal plane. The poloidal compression–expansion cycle is collisionlessly coupled with the toroidal cloud shaping through the self-electric fields and manifests as an elongation–contraction cycle of the crescent on the toroidal midplane. A radical improvement of the device’s confinement is observed when its volume is isotropically compressed keeping other parameters the same. The numerical design of the partial toroidal trap has several novel aspects such as the use of specialized numerical “pseudo-dielectric” layers for producing functional end-plug fields in the numerical device setup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207