MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204864307 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v22i13.3909

Training Sessions in the Organization and Its Impact on the Procedural System

2020· article· en· W3204864307 on OpenAlex
Jordi Gimeno Beviá

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicViolence, Education, and Gender Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcquittalConvictionCompliance (psychology)EnforcementAction (physics)BusinessLiabilityPerspective (graphical)Criminal liabilityCriminal lawLaw and economicsPublic relationsLawPolitical sciencePsychologyEconomicsComputer scienceAccountingSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The criminal liability of legal entities brought with it a need for self-regulation in the business environment, so organizations are increasingly adopting criminal enforcement programs. Within them, training and communication are fundamental for a correct implementation, considering that the professionals of the entity are the ones who shape the will and/or the action of the legal entity. If they are well trained in regulatory compliance, it will allow the company to reduce criminal risk, as well as establish a true compliance culture. Thus, if the company is involved in criminal proceedings, both must be analyzed from an evidentiary perspective since, as will be seen, they are very relevant in terms of conviction, acquittal or mitigation of the organization's criminal liability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it