MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3204910028 · doi:10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0150

Deaths from cardiovascular disease involving anticoagulants: a systematic synthesis of coroners’ case reports

2021· article· en· W3204910028 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Anis, Carl Heneghan, Jeffrey K Aronson, Nicholas DeVito, Georgia C. Richards

Bibliographic record

VenueBJGP Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRivaroxabanDiseaseMedical emergencyWarfarinSAFERIntensive care medicineFamily medicineComputer securityAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The global burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is forecast to increase, and anticoagulants will remain important medicines for its management. Coroners’ Prevention of Future Death reports (PFDs) provide valuable insights that may enable safer and more effective use of these agents. Aim To identify CVD-related PFDs involving anticoagulants. Design and Setting Retrospective observational study of coronial case reports in England and Wales between 2013 and 2019. Method We screened 3037 PFDs for eligibility and included PFDs where CVD and an anticoagulant caused or contributed to the death. We descriptively analysed included cases and used content analysis to assess concerns raised by coroners and who responded to them. Results We identified 113 cardiovascular disease-related PFDs involving anticoagulants. Warfarin (36%), enoxaparin (11%), and rivaroxaban (11%) were the most common anticoagulants reported. Concerns most frequently raised by coroners included poor systems (31%), poor communication (25%), and failures to keep accurate medical records (25%). These concerns were most often directed to NHS trusts (29%), hospitals (10%), and general practices (8%). Nearly two-thirds (60%) of PFDs had not received responses from such organisations, which are mandatory under regulation 28 of the Coroners’ (Investigations) Regulations 2013. We created a publicly available tool, https://preventabledeathstracker.net/ , which displays coroners’ reports in England and Wales to streamline access and identify important lessons to prevent future deaths. Conclusion National organisations, healthcare professionals, and prescribers should take actions to address the concerns of coroners’ in PFDs to improve the safe use of anticoagulants in patients with cardiovascular disease. How this fits in A previous assessment of 500 PFDs identified anticoagulants as the class of drugs most often involved in fatal medication errors. This study uses innovative methods to automatically collect all available PFDs between 2013 and 2019 to identify deaths from cardiovascular disease when the use of or lack of anticoagulants caused or contributed to the death. Coroners’ raised hundreds of coroners in their reports, including issues with communication, following protocols, education and training, access to resources, and safety. Despite repeat concerns with national relevance being identified, most CVD-anticoagulant PFDs were sent locally to NHS Trusts, hospitals, and general practices, limiting their ability to reduce harms and prevent premature deaths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.050
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.256
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0500.256
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0690.032
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJGP Open→Same topicAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→