<i>Legal Recognition of Non-Conjugal Families: New Frontiers in Family Law in the US, Canada and Europe</i>, Nausica Palazzo
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the preface to Nausica Palazzo’s stimulating and rigorous book, she illustrates the stakes of her project by noting that, when the harshest phase of Italy’s COVID-19 lockdown ended, in spring 2020, people in that country could exit their ‘lairs to meet – at a one-metre distance – [their] family’.1 Numerous rights, obligations, and privileges attach to the ties consecrated by our lawmakers as familial and the mismatch between our laws and the rich diversity of our affective lives has worried at least some scholars and policymakers for decades. Addressing ‘lawyers, sociologists and scholars from all disciplines’, Palazzo aims ‘to deepen understanding of the variety of ways in which we live family throughout life and of the possibility for expressions of choice to – even – gain legal recognition’.2 The book consists of six chapters and a conclusion. The first two chapters make up the first of the book’s two parts, under the heading ‘New Families and Law-makers’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it