[Summary of the best evidence for the management of endotracheal intubation and extubation in adult mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit based on guidelines and randomized controlled trials].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the best evidence for extubation management of adult patients with mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU), which will provide practical guidelines for medical staffs. METHODS: BMJ best clinical practice, UpToDate clinical consultants, Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO), Medlive guide, Cochrane Library, JBI evidence-based Health Care Center Database, Web of Science, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Ebsco, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang Database, etc., were systematically searched. Clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, expert consensus, and randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were searched from the above database unit August 31st, 2020. Literature quality was evaluated using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II), JBI quality evaluation tools, and Cochrane risk bias assessment. Two researchers evaluated the quality of the included literature respectively, and then the best evidence of endotracheal intubation and extubation management in ICU adult patients with mechanical ventilation was extracted and summarized. RESULTS: A total of 12 articles were collected, including 2 guidelines, 5 systematic reviews, 2 expert consensus, and 3 RCTs. This paper summarizes 17 best evidences on extubation management of adult patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU, including accurate pre-extubation assessment, personnel and equipment, medication, posture, oxygen therapy, airway management, and post-extubation monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Medical staff should choose the best evidence that meets the requirements of the clinical settings and standardize the management of patients after extubation to reduce the incidence of complications and re-intubation rate to ensure the safety of patients, which will be very important for the management of ICU adult patients with mechanical ventilation after extubation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.134 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.016 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".