MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204934526 · doi:10.1080/08263663.2021.1970410

Violencia política en los márgenes del Estado: Autonomía comunitaria afro-indígena en la Costa Atlántica de Nicaragua

2021· article· es· W3204934526 on OpenAlexaff
Dolores Figueroa Romero, Miguel González Pérez

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies in Central America
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Basado en una perspectiva descolonial de los márgenes del Estado y las geografías racializadas, este ensayo ofrece un análisis del proyecto revolucionario integracionista hacia la Costa Atlántica. El texto revela los efectos racistas y discriminatorios de la construcción de Nicaragua como una nación mestizo-hispano hablante, inscritos en las políticas civilizatorias sandinistas a lo largo de varios períodos históricos. Los ejes de análisis se enfocan en (1) la racialización de lo indígena y la violencia política en la guerra durante los años 1980s en la Costa, (2) la recomposición de lo comunitario y la autonomía de los pueblos versus la autonomía institucional regional instaurada durante los 1990s, y (3) la línea divisoria por géneros de la resistencia comunitaria y territorial a la violencia y el desplazamiento experimentado en la última década. De esta forma, el artículo descentra el discurso autonomista oficialista y el nacionalismo nicaragüense para hacer presente los bordes disruptivos desde donde se formulan imaginarios políticos y órdenes de legalidad y soberanía alternativos a los confines delineados por las formaciones estatales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbesSame topicHistorical Studies in Central AmericaFrench-language works237,207