Leveraging Pre-Trained Contextualized Word Embeddings to Enhance Sentiment Classification of Drug Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditionally, pharmacovigilance data are collected during clinical trials on a small sample of patients and are therefore insufficient to adequately assess drugs. Nowadays, consumers use online drug forums to share their opinions and experiences about medication. These feedbacks, which are widely available on the web, are automatically analyzed to extract relevant information for decision-making. Currently, sentiment analysis methods are being put forward to leverage consumers' opinions and produce useful drug monitoring indicators. However, these methods' effectiveness depends on the quality of word representation, which presents a real challenge because the information contained in user reviews is noisy and very subjective. Over time, several sentiment classification problems use machine learning methods based on the traditional bag of words model, sometimes enhanced with lexical resources. In recent years, word embedding models have significantly improved classification performance due to their ability to capture words' syntactic and semantic properties. Unfortunately, these latter models are weak in sentiment classification tasks because they are unable to encode sentiment information in the word representation. Indeed, two words with opposite polarities can have close word embeddings as they appear together in the same context. To overcome this drawback, some studies have proposed refining pre-trained word embeddings with lexical resources or learning word embeddings using training data. However, these models depend on external resources and are complex to implement. This work proposes a deep contextual word embeddings model called ELMo that inherently captures the sentiment information by providing separate vectors for words with opposite polarities. Different variants of our proposed model are compared with a benchmark of pre-trained word embeddings models using SVM classifier trained on Drug Review Dataset. Experimental results show that ELMo embeddings improve classification performance in sentiment analysis tasks on the pharmaceutical domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".