In Situ Monitoring of Mechanochemical Covalent Organic Framework Formation Reveals Templating Effect of Liquid Additive
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have emerged as a new class of molecularly precise, porous functional materials characterized by a broad structural and chemical versatility, leading to a diverse range of applications. Despite the increasing popularity of COFs, fundamental aspects of their formation are poorly understood and profound experimental insights into their formation processes are still lacking. Here we use a combination of in situ X-ray powder diffraction and Raman spectroscopy to elucidate the reaction mechanism of mechanochemically synthesized imine COFs, leading to the observation of key reaction intermediates. Real-time monitoring provides experimental evidence of templating effects by the liquid additive for the subsequent pore formation and layer assembly. Moreover, the solid-state catalyst scandium triflate Sc(OTf) 3 is revealed to be instrumental in directing the reaction kinetics and mechanism, resulting in products with crystallinity and porosity en par with solvothermally synthesized COFs. This work highlights the potential of mechanochemistry as a green synthetic route towards COF synthesis, and emphasizes the subtle interplay between choice of liquid additives, catalysts, and activation procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it