MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204978982 · doi:10.1063/5.0065222

Perspectives on all-optical Kerr switching for quantum optical applications

2021· article· en· W3204978982 on OpenAlexafffund
Duncan England, Frédéric Bouchard, Kate L. Fenwick, Kent Bonsma-Fisher, Yingwen Zhang, Philip J. Bustard, Benjamin Sussman

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUltrashort pulsePhysicsPhotonicsOpticsPhotonOptical switchOptoelectronicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We offer a perspective on recent advances in picosecond-timescale all-optical switching with applications in quantum optics. The switch is based on polarization rotation in standard single-mode fiber via the optical Kerr effect. By using ultrafast laser pulses and short (∼10 cm) fibers, this technique can achieve a switching duration of ≲1 ps, at the repetition rate of 80 MHz or above. This high repetition rate is well-suited to quantum optics where experiments operate in the photon-counting regime. The switch efficiency can be ≳99% with a noise floor of just ∼10−4 photons/pulse, enabling high fidelity operations on quantum states of light, with negligible generation of spurious noise photons. We highlight the capabilities of this technique in four early applications: switching of heralded single photons, time-bin to polarization conversion of photonic qubits, noise gating for quantum key distribution, and pulse carving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207