MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205032112 · doi:10.33774/chemrxiv-2021-cn0px

Efficiently transforming from values of a function on a sparse grid to basis coefficients

2021· preprint· en· W3205032112 on OpenAlexafffund
Tucker Carrington, Robert Wodraszka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsSparse gridBasis (linear algebra)Function (biology)Transformation (genetics)PiecewiseCombinatoricsBasis functionDiscrete mathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many contexts it is necessary to determine coefficients of a basis expansion of a function ${f}\left(x_1, \ldots, x_D\right) $ from values of the function at points on a sparse grid. Knowing the coefficients, one has an interpolant or a surrogate. For example, such coefficients are used in uncertainty quantification. In this chapter, we present an efficient method for computing the coefficients. It uses basis functions that, like the familiar piecewise linear hierarchical functions, are zero at points in previous levels. They are linear combinations of any, e.g. global, nested basis functions $\varphi_{i_k}^{\left(k\right)}\left(x_k\right)$. Most importantly, the transformation from function values to basis coefficients is done, exploiting the nesting, by evaluating sums sequentially. When the number of functions in level $\ell_k$ equals $\ell_k$ (i.e. when the level index is increased by one, only one point (function) is added) and the basis function indices satisfy ${\left\lVert\mathbf{i}-\mathbf{1}\right\lVert_1 \le b}$, the cost of the transformation scales as $\mathcal{O}\left(D \left[\frac{b}{D+1} + 1\right] N_\mathrm{sparse}\right)$, where $N_\mathrm{sparse}$ is the number of points on the sparse grid. We compare the cost of doing the transformation with sequential sums to the cost of other methods in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207