Le jardin urbain de la Grande Bibliothèque : lieu ouvert et espace contesté
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La problématique générale de la médialité questionne les processus de sédimentation, de circulation et de production de la culture urbaine. À partir du jardin urbain de la Grande Bibliothèque, dans le centre-ville de Montréal, ce sont les transformations actuelles de l’espace public, et sa phénoménologie quotidienne, qui sont aussi interrogées. Ce jardin urbain est un lieu ouvert sur la ville et il prend place dans l’espace discursif contradictoire. Les stratégies artistiques, les contraintes de la trame urbaine, les projets de développement et de revitalisation des îlots adjacents, les usages et les mémoires du lieu, toutes ces dimensions forcent à un « recadrage » non seulement du jardin lui-même en tant que configuration significative, mais du spectacle de la ville qui se déroule dedans et dehors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".