MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205120821 · doi:10.1002/cyto.b.21142

Feasibility study: Phosphospecific flow cytometry enabling rapid functional analysis of bone marrow samples from patients with multiple myeloma

2013· article· en· W3205120821 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHéma-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow cytometryBone marrowMultiplexMultiple myelomaPathologyCancer researchMedicineMolecular biologyCell biologyBiologyChemistryImmunologyBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer accounting for about 2% of cancer deaths. Its diagnosis is based on a combination of criteria, which are not always easily measurable. Flow cytometry now allows multiplex analysis of intracellular signaling at the single cell level. We investigated the feasibility of using intracellular protein phosphorylation analysis by flow cytometry on primary plasma cells from bone marrow and its usefulness in MM diagnosis.Cells from frozen bone marrow of five MM patients and four normal donors were stimulated with LPS, IL-6, IL-21, IFNα and TNFα. Cells were stained by fluorescent cell barcoding to allow multiplex analysis. Staining with antibodies against phosphorylated NFkB-p65, Stat1, Stat3, and p38 were used to identify cellular responses following stimulation.Activation profiles of MM and normal plasma cells have been established. MM cells showed heterogeneous response profiles while normal cells responses were homogeneous between donors. We also noticed that many MM samples seemed to show elevated basal level of Stat3 phosphorylation. These results suggest that different response profiles in primary MM cells might correspond to different subtypes of the disease. Thus, we provide an example of how these results may be used as a criterion for MM subtypes classification.We demonstrate that flow cytometry can be used to study signaling pathways in primary MM cells. The heterogeneity observed in MM cells from different patients can prove valuable for MM characterization and represents an interesting avenue for future research in MM diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.013
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it