Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Measurements May Provide an Incomplete View of Protein Dynamics: a Case Study on Cytochrome <i>c</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many aspects of protein function rely on conformational fluctuations. Hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX) mass spectrometry (MS) provides a window into these dynamics. Despite the widespread use of HDX-MS, it remains unclear whether this technique provides a truly comprehensive view of protein dynamics. HDX is mediated by H-bond-opening/closing events, implying that HDX methods provide an H-bond-centric view. This raises the question if there could be fluctuations that leave the H-bond network unaffected, thereby rendering them undetectable by HDX-MS. We explore this issue in experiments on cytochrome c (cyt c ). Compared to the Fe(II) protein, Fe(III) cyt c shows enhanced deuteration on both the distal and proximal sides of the heme. Previous studies have attributed the enhanced dynamics of Fe(III) cyt c to the facile and reversible rupture of the distal M80–Fe(III) bond. Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we conducted a detailed analysis of various cyt c conformers. Our MD data confirm that rupture of the M80–Fe(III) contact triggers major reorientation of the distal Ω loop. Surprisingly, this event takes place with only miniscule H-bonding alterations. In other words, the distal loop dynamics are almost “HDX-silent”. Moreover, distal loop movements cannot account for enhanced dynamics on the opposite (proximal) side of the heme. Instead, enhanced deuteration of Fe(III) cyt c is attributed to sparsely populated conformers where both the distal (M80) and proximal (H18) coordination bonds have been ruptured, along with opening of numerous H-bonds on both sides of the heme. We conclude that there can be major structural fluctuations that are only weakly coupled to changes in H-bonding, making them virtually impossible to track by HDX-MS. In such cases, HDX-MS may provide an incomplete view of protein dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".