The Emergence of the Unionist Party in the Colonial Punjab (1923-1946): Politics of Opportunism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The colonial Punjab, ‘the flower bed of Indian Army’ remained a backwater for the nationalist movement. The province was considered a ‘security zone’ by the colonial administrators and was never allowed to develop democratic institutions like other Indian provinces. Till the 1919 reform, the Punjab was deprived of a constitutional government and maintained as a non-regulation province. There was no Executive Council or High Court and it did not have any effective representation in the Imperial Council. Immediately after its annexation, the province was placed under the authoritarian form of administration by Lord Dalhousie’s handpicked British officers, which came to be known as the Punjab School of Administration having a paternalistic attitude towards the province.1 The ‘imperial experiment’ that was conducted in the Punjab between 1849-1856, the period of Lord Dalhousie’s governor-generalship, was essentially an experience in authoritarianism and political exclusiveness, which became a trade- mark of colonial policies in Punjab.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".