MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205223030 · doi:10.1115/icone28-64530

Study on Deteriorated Heat Transfer in Upward Flow of Supercritical Water in a 1-M Vertical Bare Tube

2021· article· en· W3205223030 on OpenAlexaff
Nikita Dort-Goltz, Igor Pioro, Jennifer M. McKellar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupercritical fluidHeat transferThermal hydraulicsBundleWork (physics)MechanicsThermodynamicsFlow (mathematics)Materials scienceTube (container)ThermalNuclear engineeringPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract SuperCritical Water-cooled Reactors (SCWRs) represent potential improvements over traditional water-cooled reactors in many respects, including thermal efficiency. These reactors are still under development, however, thermalhydraulics data needed for their design are lacking. Experimentation is complex and costly. In spite of a large number of experiments in long bare tubes (pipes) cooled with SCW, developing SCWR concepts requires experimental data in bundle geometries cooled with SCW, which are usually shorter and will have smaller hydraulic-equivalent diameters. As a first step, tests have been conducted by others on heat transfer in short, vertical bare tubes cooled with the upward flow of SCW. The objective of this work is to analyze that collected data with particular attention to the Deteriorated Heat Transfer (DHT) regime. The DHT regime is characterized by reduced Heat Transfer Coefficients (HTCs) and consequently increased wall temperatures. As such, it represents a hazard to the safe operation of a Nuclear Power Plant (NPP). The results of this analysis indicate that DHT did occur in each of the tests analyzed, often seen as a gradual decrease in HTC along the heated length, but occasionally as a sharp “dip”. The DHT can occur along the heated length, when the bulk-fluid temperature is close to or within the pseudocritical region. The results also confirmed that the Dittus-Boelter correlation does not adequately predict HTCs within the pseudocritical region. Two other applied correlations (Gupta et al. and Mokry et al.) performed better, but neither was able to predict the occurrence of the DHT. The results of this analysis will be of use to designers and developers of SCWRs, and can help to plan future experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat transfer and supercritical fluidsFrench-language works237,207