Diagnosis of Leaf Surface Disease Using Two Datasets of Tomato and Rice Obtained from Image Processing Techniques
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is of a great importance in modern agriculture to study fast, automatic, inexpensive and accurate method of diagnosing plant diseasesTherefore, timely and accurately diagnosis of the disease in the fields is one of the most important factors in dealing with plant diseases. For this reason, in the present study, the image processing method study, has been examined for diagnosing the two important diseases of rice and tomato, brown spots and leaf blasts. In this study, firstly the data section is treated using improved k-means segmentation, after preprocessing. Secondly, comprehensive features are extracted and the disease areas are demarcated. An improved genetic algorithm is used in the feature selection step. Finally, images are categorized using the k-nearest neighbor’s algorithm (k-NN) classifier. The accuracy of the proposed method for the rice data set is 99.12 and for the tomato data set is 97.29, which shows a very good performance compared to other methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it