Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Syphilis is an uncommon cause of optic nerve head edema; however, differentiating syphilis from other etiologies of optic nerve head swelling may be challenging. We describe 4 cases of ocular syphilis presenting with swollen optic nerve head(s) without overt signs of intraocular inflammation to better define the phenotypic presentation of this condition to allow its early recognition and treatment and discuss potential pathophysiological mechanisms of syphilitic optic neuropathy. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients presenting to a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practice with a swollen optic nerve head(s) but no overt signs of intraocular inflammation, which was eventually determined to be secondary to syphilis. RESULTS: Four patients were included in the study. The mean age was 43 years, 2 were women and 2 had bilateral involvement. Two patients had a recent history of skin rash, and one patient was investigated for abdominal pain and elevated liver enzymes. Two patients presented with photopsias and preserved visual function, whereas 2 presented with vision loss. Although chorioretinitis was present in all cases, it was very subtle in all and was only appreciated on fundus autofluorescence (FA) in 3 of 4 cases. Three patients demonstrated evidence of optic perineuritis on neuro-imaging. All patients were treated with a course of intravenous penicillin with a variable degree of visual recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic symptoms are common in patients with syphilic optic neuropathy. Optic disc edema as a manifestation of syphilis is usually accompanied by subtle chorioretinitis, which is best appreciated on FA. Optic perineuritis is common in patients with syphilitic optic neuropathy, with its pathophysiology likely similar to meningitis seen in neurosyphilis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".