Las representaciones pre-profesionales de la docencia : análisis estructural y comparativo entre dos grupos de futuros maestros de Ontario.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo tiene como finalidad presentar un análisis comparativo que establece diferencias en la estructura y el contenido de las representaciones sociales pre-profesionales de la docencia entre un grupo de futuros maestros de los ciclos primario y medio y otro de los ciclos medio e intermedio de la Facultad de Educación de Laurentian University (Ontario, Canadá). Para el análisis se acudió a la teoría del núcleo central, propuesta por Abric (1976), ya que permite identificar tanto los elementos del sistema central de toda representación como los del sistema periférico. El examen de los resultados muestra que la estructura y el contenido de la representación de la docencia son similares para ambos grupos, pero al mismo tiempo se constata una importante diferencia entre ambos. También se evidenció que el núcleo central está integrado de elementos normativos mientras que el sistema periférico está compuesto por elementos normativos y funcionales propios a la docencia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".