MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205508855 · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00428-9

Author Correction: Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial–mesenchymal transition

2021· review· en· W3205508855 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Yang, Parker B. Antin, Geert Berx, Cédric Blanpain, Thomas Brabletz, Marianne Bronner‐Fraser, Kyra Campbell, Amparo Cano, Jordi Casanova, Gerhard Christofori, Shoukat Dedhar, Rik Derynck, Heide L. Ford, Jonas Fuxe, Antonio García de Herreros, Gregory J. Goodall, Anna‐Katerina Hadjantonakis, Ruby Yun‐Ju Huang, Chaya Kalcheim, Raghu Kalluri, Yibin Kang, Yeesim Khew‐Goodall, Herbert Levine, Jinsong Liu, Gregory D. Longmore, Sendurai A. Mani, Joan Massagué, Roberto Mayor, David R. McClay, Keith E. Mostov, Donald F. Newgreen, M. Ángela Nieto, Alain Puisieux, Raymond B. Runyan, Pierre Savagner, Ben Z. Stanger, Marc P. Stemmler, Yoshiko Takahashi, Masatoshi Takeichi, Eric Théveneau, Jean Paul Thiery, Erik W. Thompson, Robert A. Weinberg, Elizabeth D. Williams, Jianhua Xing, Binhua P. Zhou, Guojun Sheng

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpithelial–mesenchymal transitionTransition (genetics)Mesenchymal stem cellComputational biologyCell biologyChemistryComputer scienceBiologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correction to: Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-0237-9 , published online 16 April 2020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.165
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.165
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0090.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.331
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature Reviews Molecular Cell BiologySame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207