MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

IN VITRO ANTHELMINTIC ACTIVITY OF WATER AND ETHANOLIC EXTRACT OF STEM-BARK OF DOLICHONDRONE FALCATA (SEEM)

2021· article· en· W3205510489 on OpenAlexaff
Nitin B. Aher, Sanjay Chaudhari, Atul Baravkar, Jeevan Suresh Dhumal

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Allied Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthelminticBark (sound)Traditional medicineIn vitroBiologyMedicineZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water and ethanolic extracts of Dolichondrone falcata (Seem) were evaluated for their anthelmintic activity using Indian mature earthworm called Pheretima posthuma. Various concentrations of water and ethanolic extract ranging from 10 to 100 mg/ml were made and tested on said earthworm. The bioassays were tested for these extracts which include time for paralysis and time for death of the worms. Water as well as ethanolic extract revealed good anthelmintic activity at concentration of 100 mg/ml. Lower concentrations did not produced any significant anthelmintic activity. The standard reference drug used is piperazine citrate at concentration of 10 mg/ml for comparing anthelmintic activity of these extracts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Allied SciencesSame topicSoil and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207