MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205523561

GUERREROS Y DANZANTES EN EL ARTE RUPESTRE EN LA BIÓSFERA TEHUACAN-CUICATLÁN, MÉXICO

2021· article· es· W3205523561 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandra Liliana Ramírez Barrera

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Geological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRock artGeographyDesert (philosophy)CaveBiosphereCultural heritageArchaeologyEthnologyEcologyHistoryPolitical scienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Tehuacan Cuicatlan Biosphere Reserve, in Mexico, is characterized as a semi-desert areawhere, over the centuries, human groups have adapted and transformed it according to their needs.In it, there are several areas with rock art that had a cultural function at a given moment. As anexample, we have Cerro Dade that is located in the Mixteca region, in the north of the Biosphere.Among the existing panels, made with red paint, there are several anthropomorphs that representwarriors with attributes and objects than they carry. The use of the human figure extends to thesouth of the Reserve, in the Canada region but in this case the figures, executed with white paint,seem to be part of a ritual act. It should be noted that most of them use vertical rock supports. Anopposite case is “the Cave of the Musicians” in the current state of Puebla, where the rock scenedefines a confrontation of warriors executed in various shades of pigment, and whose locationcorresponds to a covacha located in a set of desert elevations of difficult access. The objective ofthis work is to show an overview of the cultural heritage existing in this ecological niche based onrock art, highlighting the role of the human figure as a leading image. The result of this firstapproach resulted in the identification of differences in styleand technique, but coincides in the useof topography according to a cultural objective: make it evident in sight or reserve it for some howmany, behavior depending on, perhaps, the intention of the message.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchaeological and Geological StudiesFrench-language works237,207