MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205562261 · doi:10.4064/aa220315-13-8

Statistics for $p$-ranks of Artin–Schreier covers

2022· preprint· en· W3205562261 on OpenAlexaff
Anwesh Ray

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Arithmetica · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsInfinityIsomorphism (crystallography)Finite fieldCombinatoricsPrime (order theory)Limit (mathematics)GenusAlgebraic number fieldDistribution (mathematics)Discrete mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a prime $p$ and $q$ a power of $p$, we study the statistics of $p$-ranks of Artin–Schreier covers of given genus defined over $\mathbb F_q$, in the large $q$-limit. We refer to this problem as the <em>geometric problem</em>. We also study an <em>ari

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa ArithmeticaSame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207