The children's animated cartoon as a factor of family social health
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents the results of the study of modern Russian animated cartoons from the point of view of their impact on family social health. The social health is formed on the basis of certain values. The destruction of the family values system negatively affects the formation of family social health. The animated cartoons are an important institutional mechanism of socialization of children, because the traditional institutions that shape values of the younger generation are largely losing their role, first of all the matter is about the institution of family. The original observation card for content analysis was applied. The analysis was applied to the animated cartoons distributed in 1992 - present time with a total time volume of 6500 minutes. The analysis of the representation of family in animated cartoons permitted to identify a typical image of family in modern Russian animated cartoons that is presented as a complete nuclear parental family where the relationship between spouses is characterized as pseudo-cooperation, raising the only child-teenager in authoritarian style. In Russian animated cartoons, only 54% of families are presented as full. The extended families are presented in 11% of animated cartoons. The quarter of all families presented in modern Russian animated cartoons, are a married couple without children, where family situations are built around the relationship of young couple that have got married recently.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".