MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205629722 · doi:10.32843/infrastruct57-12

SPECIFIC FEATURES OF DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS DEVELOPMENT IN UKRAINE: MODERN ASPECTS

2021· article· en· W3205629722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMarket Infrastructure · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecentralizationBusinessUkrainianPolitical scienceEconomic growthPublic administrationEconomic policyEconomic systemEconomicsMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main goal of the research is to analyze modern aspects of decentralization process in Ukraine, taking into acount the peculiarities of its functioning and development, the perspective ways of its development. The article presents the peculiarities of decentralization development in Ukraine. Some decentralized models of different countries of the world are analyzed. Some special forms of governmental support of territorial communities in Ukraine are given. Among them there are informational, methodical, financial, organizational issues. The appropriate projects and programs which were implemented in Ukraine and supported by the European countries and international organizations are described. It is established that today Ukraine's long-term plan of activities as for the reforms' implementation is financially supported by such international financial and donor organizations as the Swiss Cooperation Office, the Canadian International Development Agency, the Eastern Europe Foundation, the PAUCI Foundation for Ukrainian-Polish Cooperation, the European Union. It has been proven that through economic programs, investment projects and contracts at the local level some issues of economic development, landscaping, social assistance, culture and health care can be solved The financial incentives for the effective development of local communities in terms of intergovernmental transfers and donor financial assistance are substantiated. It was found that as a result of tax reform and reform of inter-budgetary relations, local authorities receive additional financial resources to fulfill a significant number of their own and delegated powers. It is emphasized that the state assumes responsibility for the social status of its citizens. That means the policy pursued at the state level should be consistent and socially responsible. The management system of the State Regional Policy (RPM) in Ukraine is observed. It was found out that some uninvolved potentials of the Ukrainian development at different levels of functioning should be activated. According to that it is planned to develop and improve new system of State Regional Policy management by implementing the efficient programs and projects. It is established that the State Fund of Regional Development (SFRD) has been established at the governmental level in order to support investment programs and projects of local and central executive bodies and local self-government bodies. It has been proven that as a result of financial decentralization a new model of the budget and tax system can be formed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it