MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205655332 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2021.55012

The Error Analysis and Teaching Research of Chinese Special Sentence Pattern

2021· article· en· W3205655332 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ting Zhang, Ming Liu, Shi Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSecond Language Acquisition and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSentenceEllipsis (linguistics)LinguisticsChinese as a foreign languageComputer scienceForeign languageFocus (optics)Error analysisNatural language processingCharacter (mathematics)AnalogyArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ba construction is a special sentence pattern in Chinese with specific features. There is no corresponding sentence pattern in Spanish. The Ba construction runs through every stage of teaching Chinese as a foreign language because it is difficult for learners whose native language is Spanish to master. Supported by error analysis theory, this paper, based on a current corpus and the daily homework of Chinese learners whose native language is Spanish regarding the use of the character Ba, carries out a quantitative analysis of biased errors in the use of Ba. Using the surface strategy classification approach, the biased errors are placed into five categories: ellipsis, annexation, analogy, wrong order and other. This paper analyses the causes of the biased errors from the perspectives of interlingual bias and intralingual bias and proposes feasible suggestions for the teaching of the Ba construction in Chinese as a foreign language with a focus on teachers, teaching activities and teaching materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.437 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Educational Technology and PsychologySame topicSecond Language Acquisition and LearningFrench-language works237,207