Air transportation as a central component of remote community resilience in northern Ontario, Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research investigates the role air transportation plays in remote community resilience by examining air cargo delivery and flight operations in northern Ontario, Canada. Building off of the Disaster Resilience of Place (DROP) model for community resilience, we develop a high-level interdependency model that shows the interdependencies between community infrastructure systems and air transportation in the unique context of remote communities that rely on air transportation. Air transportation is the only mode of travel available year-round for the 26 remote communities studied. Alternative modes are seasonal (e.g., winter roads) and threatened by climate change. Analysing 6 years of cargo data highlights infrastructure interdependencies in energy, the built environment, and transportation systems. Flight operations data and semi-structured interviews with airline employees advance our understanding of air transportation infrastructure and operating challenges that impact flight reliability and ultimately remote community resilience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it