Parallel Algorithm on GPU for Wireless Sensor Data Acquisition Using a Team of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a framework for the wireless sensor data acquisition using a team of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Scattered over a terrain, the sensors detect information about their surroundings and can transmit this information wirelessly over a short range. With no access to a terrestrial or satellite communication network to relay the information to, UAVs are used to visit the sensors and collect the data. The proposed framework uses an iterative k-means algorithm to group the sensors into clusters and to identify Download Points (DPs) where the UAVs hover to download the data. A Single-Source-Shortest-Path algorithm (SSSP) is used to compute optimal paths between every pair of DPs with a constraint to reduce the number of turns. A genetic algorithm supplemented with a 2-opt local search heuristic is used to solve the multi-travelling salesperson problem and to find optimized tours for each UAVs. Finally, a collision avoidance strategy is implemented to guarantee collision-free trajectories. Concerned with the overall runtime of the framework, the SSSP algorithm is implemented in parallel on a graphics processing unit. The proposed framework is tested in simulation using three UAVs and realistic 3D maps with up to 100 sensors and runs in just 20.7 s, a 33.3× speed-up compared to a sequential execution on CPU. The results show that the proposed method is efficient at calculating optimized trajectories for the UAVs for data acquisition from wireless sensors. The results also show the significant advantage of the parallel implementation on GPU.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".