O MODELO DE GESTÃO EDUCACIONAL DAS ESCOLAS CIDADÃS INTEGRAIS DA PARAÍBA: ANÁLISE DE UM CADERNO FORMATIVO À LUZ DO ISD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo apresenta uma análise de um dos cadernos de formação desenvolvido pelo Instituto de Corresponsabilidade pela Educação (ICE), intitulado “Modelo de Gestão: Tecnologia de Gestão Educacional”, que orienta e, de certa forma, condiciona a gestão das escolas pertencentes ao Programa de Educação Integral na Paraíba. A análise teve por objetivo identificar quais são os princípios, conceitos e fundamentos presentes no documento. Buscou, ainda, desvelar como estão representadas, no documento, as tensões entre as esferas pública e privada, a partir de aspectos enunciativos do texto (vozes e modalizações). Esta pesquisa se insere no campo da Linguística Aplicada (LA) e compartilha da natureza indisciplinar e transgressiva desse campo do saber (MOITA LOPES, 2006; PENNYCOOK, 2006). Desenvolvido à luz do Interacionismo Sociodiscursivo (BRONCKART, 1999, 2006, 2012), este trabalho também se embasa nas contribuições de teóricos da educação, como Ball (2014), Laval (2019) e Libâneo (2016). Na análise, considera-se que o documento ilustra um movimento que busca atuar fortemente na redução da esfera de autonomia das escolas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".