MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205819728

O PROCESSO DE INSTITUCIONALIZAÇÃO DA ADOÇÃO NO BRASIL A PARTIR DOS ORFANATOS: UMA ANÁLISE DA SÉRIE ANNE WITH AN E

2021· article· pt· W3205819728 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaqueline Da Silva Caires, Luis Paulo Ferraz de Oliveira

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Sexuality, and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este estudo busca investigar o processo de institucionalizacao da politica de adocao no Brasil a partir da observacao da serie Anne With an E e, somado a isso, compreender se existia e qual era a protecao conferida a crianca e adolescente orfao. Procura-se entender a atuacao do Estado frente as necessidades imprescindiveis para a defesa da dignidade dos sujeitos orfaos. Analisam-se as consequencias promovidas pela politica de adocao e assistencia aos menores por meio da criacao dos orfanatos como forma de amparo institucional. A pesquisa ira se basear na observacao da obra audiovisual “ Anne with an E”, direcao de Niki Caro e David Evans, que conta a historia da garota Anne Shirley, orfa que deixa o orfanato de Nova Escocia-Canada e encara o processo de adaptacao no meio familiar e social. Sera utilizada, tambem, a teoria do filosofo Michel Foucault para estudar a formacao das politicas de institucionalizacao e a existencia dos orfanatos e casas de apoio como “heterotopias sociais”. O metodo de estudo utilizado e a pesquisa bibliografica e exploratoria, por meio da revisao teorica, filosofica e cinematografica, de cunho indutivo, e com base em artigos e trabalhos que dialoguem com a tematica desenvolvida.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGender, Sexuality, and EducationFrench-language works237,207