TINDAK PIDANA MELARIKAN PEREMPUAN DI BAWAH UMUR DAN PENYELESAIANNYA DI WILAYAH HUKUM KABUPATEN TANJUNG JABUNG TIMUR
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marriage is an inner and outer bond between men and women that is entwined in a domestic relationship to create a household that is sakinah mawaddah warahmah. One of the condotiont that must be obeyed in the implementation of a marriage regulated by law is that the bride and groom must be of legal age. Every marriage that has not meet the marriage age limit, is essentially called a underage marriage is affirmed in article 7 of law Number 1 of 1974 and article 1 paragraph (1) of Law Number 23 of 2002 Concerning Child Protecdtion, that is child someone who is not yet 18 years old and is a pruning of the freedom of chldren’s rights in obtaining the rights to life as a teenager who has the potential to grow, develop and potentially positively according to what is outlined in religion. The problems discussed in this thesis are the intercourse of minors in marital relations and the effects arising from such marriages, because in fiqih view no punishman is given for this action. However, if viewed from the perspective of national law, underage marriages have violated several law and regulations. The factors that influence it’s effectiveness are the subtance of the law Article 332 of the Criminal Code, Law Number 16 of 2019 and Law Number 23 of 2002. The conclusion of this thesis is that the aplication of sanctions against underage run away women in marriage in Tanjung Jabung Timur Regency has never been applied because the are no reports from the victims althought the criminal law regulates sanctions againts the perpetrators because it has caused harm to the victims (women)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it