Sleep and its effect on mental health among adolescent and adult population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The global prevalence of mental disorders is on the rise and sleep disorders have been recognized among one of the major contributors affecting well-being and longevity of both young and adult population. Sleep habits are multifaceted and arise from complex interactions between socio-environmental, behavioral, and psychological factors, and any disruptions in the balance of the previous may negatively alter sleep duration and sleep quality leading to sleep disorders, however this phenomenon may vary by age and sex. Emerging evidence suggest that adolescents entering pubertal development face many sleep changes due to biological factors like delay in circadian rhythm and decreased homeostatic sleep pressure as well as due to social factors which may lead to sleep disorders subsequently affecting adolescents' mental health. Sleep hygiene among young population is of primary importance especially as chronic sleep disruption may be a risk factor for mental disorders and multimorbidity along the lifespan, and importantly these association have been proved to be bi-directional. Thus, public health initiatives and guidelines to promote sleep hygiene should emerge in order increase the awareness of sleep disorders and their role in prevention and management of mental disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".