MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205961714 · doi:10.4000/jsa.19610

Desafíos de la colaboración digital entre museos etnológicos y comunidades indígenas: dos perspectivas, una conclusión

2021· article· es· W3205961714 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Scholz, Mirῖgõ-Diana Guzmán Ocampo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal de la Société des Américanistes · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept IlesMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las plataformas digitales ofrecen muchas oportunidades para la apertura y la exploración transcultural de las colecciones de los museos. Del año 2015 al 2021, el proyecto “Compartir Saberes” del Museo Etnológico de Berlín se enfrentó a los retos asociados a este nuevo campo de trabajo colaborativo. La experiencia adquirida junto con los socios indígenas de América Latina muestra que la creación de nuevas infraestructuras de conocimiento requiere un replanteamiento importante. No es suficiente abrir las colecciones a las perspectivas de los demás. Una colaboración digital exitosa debe reflejar la heterogeneidad de las infraestructuras de conocimiento de los participantes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0140.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal de la Société des AméricanistesSame topicMuseums and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207