MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205967571 · doi:10.1002/jbio.202100218

Movement correction method for laser speckle contrast imaging of cerebral blood flow in cranial windows in rodents

2021· article· en· W3205967571 on OpenAlexafffund
Jérémie Guilbert, Michèle Desjardins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biophotonics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpeckle patternSIGNAL (programming language)Contrast (vision)Speckle noiseSpeckle imagingComputer visionBlood flowCerebral blood flowArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMovement (music)Noise (video)PhysicsImage (mathematics)MedicineAcousticsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is used in clinical research to dynamically image blood flow. One drawback is its susceptibility to movement artifacts. We demonstrate a new, simple method to correct motion artifacts in LSCI signals measured in awake mice with cranial windows during sensory stimulation. The principle is to identify a region in the image in which speckle contrast (SC) is independent of blood flow and only varies with animal movement, then to regress out this signal from the data. We show that (1) the regressed signal correlates well with mouse head movement, (2) the corrected signal correlates better with independently measured blood volume and (3) it has a (59 ± 6)% higher signal-to-noise ratio. Compared to three alternative correction methods, ours has the best performance. Regressing out flow-independent global variations in SC is a simple and accessible way to improve the quality of LSCI measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BiophotonicsSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207