Brain atrophy trajectories predict differential functional performance in Alzheimer's disease: Moderations with apolipoprotein E and sex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction We examine whether distinct brain atrophy patterns (using brain parenchymal fraction [BPF]) differentially predict functional performance and decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and are independently moderated by (1) a key AD genetic risk marker (apolipoprotein E [ APOE ]), (2) sex, and (3) high‐risk group (women APOE ɛ4 carriers). Methods We used a 2‐year longitudinal sample of AD patients (baseline N = 170; mean age = 71.3 [9.1] years) from the Sunnybrook Dementia Study. We applied latent class analysis, latent growth modeling, and path analysis. We aimed to replicate our findings ( N = 184) in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Results We observed that high brain atrophy class predicted lower functional performance and steeper decline. This association was moderated by APOE , sex, and high‐risk group. Baseline findings as moderated by APOE and high‐risk group were replicated. Discussion Women APOE ɛ4 carriers may selectively be at a greater risk of functional impairment with higher brain atrophy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".