MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206048154 · doi:10.52933/jdssv.v1i2.11

A Stepwise Approach for High-Dimensional Gaussian Graphical Models

2021· article· en· W3206048154 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Data Science Statistics and Visualisation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGraphical modelPartial correlationGaussianCorrelationStepwise regressionLasso (programming language)Computer scienceAlgorithmGraphRelation (database)MinificationExploitCanonical correlationMathematicsMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceData miningMachine learningTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a stepwise approach to estimate high dimensional Gaussian graphicalmodels. We exploit the relation between the partial correlation coefficientsand the distribution of the prediction errors, and parametrize the model in termsof the Pearson correlation coefficients between the prediction errors of the nodes’best linear predictors. We propose a novel stepwise algorithm for detecting pairsof conditionally dependent variables. We compare the proposed algorithm withexisting methods including graphical lasso (Glasso), constrained `l1-minimization(CLIME) and equivalent partial correlation (EPC), via simulation studies andreal life applications. In our simulation study we consider several model settingsand report the results using different performance measures that look at desirablefeatures of the recovered graph.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it