Joint User Grouping and Power Optimization for Secure mmWave-NOMA Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the proliferation of mobile devices, provisioning of massive connectivity has become a major challenge for future networks. The combination of millimeter wave (mmWave) with non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) provides a promising solution to massive connectivity. However, the security issue therein cannot be ignored due to the openness of wireless channels. To overcome the security challenge in mmWave-NOMA based networks, the nonorthogonal interference can be exploited to improve the security. In this paper, we propose a novel mmWave-NOMA framework where the users are classified as secure users (SUs) and common users (CUs), to satisfy their heterogeneous security service needs with the presence of randomly located eavesdroppers. According to their channel disparity, the NOMA users with stronger channel gains are deemed as SUs for better secrecy performance, while the remaining ones are served as CUs. To further enhance the security, hybrid precoding for SUs is designed to strengthen the desired signal and reduce interference. In addition, to reduce the complexity and satisfy the diverse demands, user grouping and power allocation are jointly optimized to maximize the sum rate of CUs subject to the SUs’ requirements. To solve the intractable non-convex problem, we decompose it into two subproblems, i.e., user grouping and power optimization, and a hybrid SU-CU grouping algorithm and a successive convex approximation based algorithm are proposed to solve them, respectively. Finally, simulation results are provided to show the advantages of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it