MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206089641 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v22i13.3913

Presumption of Innocence and Confiscation

2020· article· en· W3206089641 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ma. Angeles Perez Cebadera

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfiscationPresumption of innocenceParliamentLawDirectiveBusinessEuropean unionPolitical scienceInternational tradeComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to analyze how it must be proved that the goods have an illicit origin and, thus, enable the extended confiscation to be agreed, after the transposition of Directive 2014/42/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the seizure and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime in the European Union, which amended the regulation of confiscation in the Criminal Code, and its impact on the right of the accused to the presumption of innocence. And, on the other hand, the different treatment given to the proof of the illicit origin of the assets acquired by third parties, since the confiscation of these assets is a civil pronouncement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.078
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.078
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.038
Scholarly communication0.0100.018
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0090.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicEuropean Criminal Justice and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207