MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3206278626 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1095964

Overlooked health priorities as Liberals form new government

2021· article· en· W3206278626 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Diana Duong, Lauren Vogel

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPublic Health Policies and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Prime ministerCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PreparednessFederal electionPublic administration2019-20 coronavirus outbreakPolitical sciencePandemicHealth policySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)MedicineHealth careLawPoliticsVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pandemic preparedness and recovery may have dominated the federal election campaign, but health advocates and policy experts say other pressing health issues also demand attention from the incoming Liberal government. Re-elected Prime Minister Justin Trudeau campaigned to curb COVID-19 by mandating

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.028
Scholarly communication0.0260.015
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0110.029
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicPublic Health Policies and Education→French-language works237,207→