MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206364061 · doi:10.1109/cdc45484.2021.9683216

Receding Horizon Control in Deep Structured Teams: A Provably Tractable Large-Scale Approach with Application to Swarm Robotics

2021· article· en· W3206364061 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceConstraint (computer-aided design)Transformation (genetics)Optimal controlOptimization problemReinforcement learningArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a deep structured tracking problem is introduced for a large number of decision-makers. The problem is formulated as a linear quadratic deep structured team, where the decision-makers wish to track a global target cooperatively while considering their local targets. For the unconstrained setup, the gauge transformation technique is used to decompose the resultant optimization problem in order to obtain a low-dimensional optimal control strategy in terms of the local and global Riccati equations. For the constrained case, however, the feasible set is not necessarily decomposable by the gauge transformation. To overcome this hurdle, we propose a family of local and global receding horizon control problems, where a carefully constructed linear combination of their solutions provides a feasible solution for the original constrained problem. The salient property of the above solutions is that they are tractable with respect to the number of decision-makers and can be implemented in a distributed manner. In addition, the main results are generalized to cases with multiple sub-populations and multiple features, including leader-follower setup, cohesive cost function and soft structural constraint. Furthermore, a class of cyber-physical attacks is proposed in terms of perturbed influence factors. A numerical example is presented to demonstrate the efficacy of the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it