Record W3206382532

CSHP Summer Educational Sessions (SES) 2015: Poster Abstracts / Séances éducatives d’été (SÉÉ) 2015 de la SCPH : Résumés des affiches

2015· article· fr· W3206382532 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Rémi Vaillancourt, Shahzeer Karmali, Michelle Kraft, Annie Pouliot, D Raiyani, Nathanael Sheehan, A Wong, Ngo H, Cintia Kovács, Alice Tseng, D. Sriram, Cora Cooke, N Labelle, Traduction de What if Einstein was wrong, Mayara Nerina Fortes Arthur, Jeffrey Proulx, Jerry Hunt, Marie‐Lou Gaucher, Alexandre Kawano, Qinghua Li, Jiannong Cao, Ho C, Eui-Hwan Chung, Mohd Khaja, Bjelajac Mejia A, Sengar, Judith Lieu, S Satchu, M MacInnis, L Herritt, S Gulka, Cathy Gray, L Zulyniak, Bill Semchuk, James Bolt, Philip Thomson, Patrick Fitch, Chas. A. Davis, Douglas Thompson, L. McKenzie, Philippe Delanghe, B Barbato, G Noormohamed, Mary L. Hewett, Eric Romeril, H Liston, F.J. Louis, Marie Theresa Coombs, Au D, Wu H, Dennis Chua, Su, C. San, S Chan, Anthony Fung, Anita Beaman, Mah C, B Tugwood, Trong-Hieu Tran, Adelais Mills, Azzam Tawaqqal Abdu, O Abdelsamad, Lml Cheung, Mario Zolezzi, Kaitlynn Fitzgerald, Chelsea Wright, B Deveau, Pamela J. Stewart, Julio Jensen, Agu R, E Stulberg, D. Irwin, Rudolf Zemek, Ken Farion, Katharina Rohde

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2015

Typearticle

Languagefr

FieldHealth Professions

TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices

Canadian institutionsnot available

Fundersnot available

KeywordsPsychologyLibrary scienceHumanitiesComputer sciencePhilosophy

DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005

metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006

Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated

Candidate categoriesScholarly communication

Consensus categoriesnone

DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none

Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable

GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other

Teacher disagreement score0.997

Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

Category	Codex	Gemma
Metaresearch	0.005	0.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)	0.001	0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)	0.001	0.001
Bibliometrics	0.002	0.001
Science and technology studies	0.004	0.001
Scholarly communication	0.003	0.002
Open science	0.001	0.005
Research integrity	0.003	0.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)	0.193	0.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.194

GPT teacher head0.521

Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work

Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it