MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206447918

Detecting Seizures from a Low-density Montage with BrainsView

2021· article· en· W3206447918 on OpenAlex
Shima Abdullateef, Javier Escudero, Vera Nenadovic, Brian Jordan, Ailsa McLellan, Milly Lo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Critically ill paediatric patients are at increased risk of having seizures without apparent clinical signs making clinical diagnosis particularly difficult. Undetected or delayed treatment of seizures worsens these patients’ functional neurological recovery. <br/>An electroencephalogram (EEG) is the gold standard method to detect seizures. Certified clinical physiologists are required to apply high density montages and neurologists are needed to interpret the recordings and identify seizures. Neither are available round the clock in the paediatric critical care units (PCCU). Thus, there is a clinical need to develop a quantitative seizure detection method using a low-density EEG montage, which may be applied by the bedside nurses in PCCU. In this project, we aim to test and adapt the BrainView’s brain connectivity assessment software to detect seizures using only 8 channels from routinely collected multi-channels EEG. <br/>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it