MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206449264 · doi:10.1364/ais.2021.jw4d.2

Dense profiling of UTLS water vapour from low earth orbit using spatial heterodyne spectroscopy: Practical considerations, challenges and solutions

2021· article· en· W3206449264 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffery Langille, Adam Bourassa, D. A. Degenstein, B. H. Solheim, Simon Paradis, Stephane Lantange, Martin Larouche

Bibliographic record

VenueOSA Optical Sensors and Sensing Congress 2021 (AIS, FTS, HISE, SENSORS, ES) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsABB (Canada)University of SaskatchewanUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater vaporTroposphereStratosphereRemote sensingMicrowave Limb SounderSpectrometerImage resolutionSpectral resolutionEnvironmental scienceTemporal resolutionOpticsSpectroscopyGrismGeologySpectral linePhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Spatial Heterodyne Observations of Water instrument (SHOW) is a limb imaging instrument that is being developed to provide accurate, dense, high vertical resolution measurements of water vapour in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. SHOW utilizes a field widened spatial heterodyne spectrometer operating in the limb viewing configuration to observe limb scattered sunlight in a small ~3 nm spectral window centered near 1365 nm. Vertically resolved images of the limb absorption spectrum are obtained with each frame that are inverted using non-linear optimal estimation to extract the vertical distribution of water vapour. The large throughput and high spectral resolution (0.02 nm unapodized) provided by the field widened SHS allows vertical profiles with a target vertical resolution of < 500 m to be obtained with rapid along track sampling (~50 km below 20 km and between 100 km – 300 km above 20 km) from a low earth orbit satellite. In this paper, we present the SHOW measurement concept and examine the practical considerations that influence design tradeoffs. We discuss the challenges and solutions that have been identified to optimize the instrument configuration and present an end-to-end simulation of the level 0 measurements, calibrations and level 2 water vapour product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSA Optical Sensors and Sensing Congress 2021 (AIS, FTS, HISE, SENSORS, ES)Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207