MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206459939 · doi:10.1115/icone28-64703

Implementation of Solar Salt as Fluid in ASYST4.1 and Validation for a Natural Circulation Loop

2021· article· en· W3206459939 on OpenAlexaff
A.K. Trivedi, D. R. Novog, C.M. Allison

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designNuclear engineeringHeat transferCoolantThermal hydraulicsMolten saltNatural circulationThermal energy storageMechanical engineeringEnvironmental scienceProcess engineeringEngineeringThermodynamicsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Various small modular reactor (SMR) designs such as Micro Modular Reactor (MMR), Stable Salt Reactor - Wasteburner (SSR-W) and the Natrium reactor utilize an intermediate molten salt loop for heat transport and thermal energy storage (TES). This technology is well proven for solar thermal plants and uses solar salt (NaNO3-KNO3 in 60:40 ratio by weight) as a heat transfer and heat storage material. The primary advantages are its thermal stability, large temperature range, low cost, high density, and low vapor pressure. For example, MMR is a prismatic block design which has emerged as one preferred concept of gas cooled reactors (GCRs) and uses helium as the primary coolant and the solar salt as intermediate fluid for transporting the heat to TES system. The current thermal hydraulic system codes can model helium as a dry non-condensable gas but in most cases solar salt properties are not available in these codes. Hence there is a lack of integrated analysis capability across the MMR-type system. An effort is made to collect a robust set of thermodynamic and transport properties and heat transfer correlations for solar salt and incorporate them into the code ASYST4.1. It will allow for the simulation of design basis accident which include the dynamics of the primary system, intermediate loop, and TES. Reliable computational tools are required for thermal hydraulics design and accident analysis of Small Modular Reactors (SMR) including associated experimental validation. One emerging tool is ASYST (Adaptive SYStem Thermal-hydraulics) - ISA (Integral Simulation and Analysis). It is a new code which combines the capabilities of SCDAPSIM/MOD4 and SAMPSON and is being developed jointly by Innovative Systems Software (ISS), USA and Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) of Japan. The thermal hydraulic module, ASYST-THA, replaces the original US NRC-developed RELAP5 code used in RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.x and the THA code used in SAMPSON, with new system level hydrodynamic options that include multidimensional, multi-fluid models originally developed by ISS and IAE. ASYST represents an internationallevel collaboration on system code development and benefits from the expertise and experiments available world-wide. This work presents the details of solar salt implementation into ASYST as well as a benchmarking study on Molten Salt Nitrate Natural Circulation Loop (MSNCL). ASYST calculated results are found to closely match the experimental data. This work has been further extended to quantify uncertainties in the calculated heater outlet/inlet temperature and the flow rate for 1600 kW case using Integrated Uncertainty Analysis (IUA) package of ASYST4.1. The margin in the temperatures is about 35 K which confirms that the ASYST can both overpredict or underpredict the experimental temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Engineering Thermal-HydraulicsFrench-language works237,207