MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3206468176 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac078

Dark energy survey year 3 results: Cosmology with peaks using an emulator approach

2022· preprint· en· W3206468176 on OpenAlexaff
D. Zürcher, Janis Fluri, Raphaël Sgier, Tomasz Kacprzak, M. Gatti, C. Doux, L Whiteway, Alexandre Réfrégier, C. Chang, N Jeffrey, Bhuvnesh Jain, Pablo Lemos, David Bacon, A. Alarcon, A. Amon, K. Bechtol, M. R. Becker, G. M. Bernstein, A. Campos, R. Chen, A. Choi, C. Davis, Joseph DeRose, Scott Dodelson, F. Elsner, J. Elvin-Poole, S. Everett, A. Ferté, D. Gruen, I. Harrison, Dragan Huterer, Mike Jarvis, P.-F. Léget, N. MacCrann, J. McCullough, J. Muir, J. Myles, A Navarro-Alsina, Shivam Pandey, J. Prat, Marco Raveri, R. P. Rollins, A. Roodman, C. Sánchez, L. Secco, E. Sheldon, T. Shin, M. A. Troxel, I. Tutusaus, B. Yin, M. Aguena, S. Allam, F. Andrade-Oliveira, J. Annis, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, D. J. Burke, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, R. Cawthon, Christopher J. Conselice, M. Costanzi, L. N. da Costa, M. E. S. Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasUniversity of EdinburghOffice of ScienceDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryUniversity of PennsylvaniaFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosUniversity of SussexHigher Education Funding Council for EnglandUniversity of PortsmouthUniversity of ChicagoTexas A and M UniversityScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichUniversity College LondonUniversity of MichiganSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungOhio State UniversityUniversity of NottinghamStanford UniversityArgonne National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyFermilabNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsPlanckOmegaDark energyRedshiftWeak gravitational lensingSpectral densityAstrophysicsSigmaMultiplicative functionLambdaGaussianCosmologyStatisticsGalaxyQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We constrain the matter density Ωm and the amplitude of density fluctuations σ8 within the ΛCDM cosmological model with shear peak statistics and angular convergence power spectra using mass maps constructed from the first three years of data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). We use tomographic shear peak statistics, including cross-peaks: peak counts calculated on maps created by taking a harmonic space product of the convergence of two tomographic redshift bins. Our analysis follows a forward-modelling scheme to create a likelihood of these statistics using N-body simulations, using a Gaussian process emulator. We take into account the uncertainty from the remaining, largely unconstrained ΛCDM parameters (Ωb, ns, and h). We include the following lensing systematics: multiplicative shear bias, photometric redshift uncertainty, and galaxy intrinsic alignment. Stringent scale cuts are applied to avoid biases from unmodelled baryonic physics. We find that the additional non-Gaussian information leads to a tightening of the constraints on the structure growth parameter yielding $S_8~\equiv ~\sigma _8\sqrt{\Omega _{\mathrm{m}}/0.3}~=~0.797_{-0.013}^{+0.015}$ (68 per cent confidence limits), with a precision of 1.8 per cent, an improvement of 38 per cent compared to the angular power spectra only case. The results obtained with the angular power spectra and peak counts are found to be in agreement with each other and no significant difference in S8 is recorded. We find a mild tension of $1.5 \, \sigma$ between our study and the results from Planck 2018, with our analysis yielding a lower S8. Furthermore, we observe that the combination of angular power spectra and tomographic peak counts breaks the degeneracy between galaxy intrinsic alignment AIA and S8, improving cosmological constraints. We run a suite of tests concluding that our results are robust and consistent with the results from other studies using DES Y3 data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→