MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206468898 · doi:10.1016/j.xops.2021.100069

Federated Learning for Microvasculature Segmentation and Diabetic Retinopathy Classification of OCT Data

2021· article· en· W3206468898 on OpenAlexafffund
Julian Lo, Timothy T. Yu, Da Ma, Pengxiao Zang, Julia P. Owen, Qinqin Zhang, Ruikang K. Wang, Mirza Faisal Beg, Aaron Lee, Yali Jia, Marinko V. Šarunic

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmology Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BCCompute Canada
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceSegmentationDiabetic retinopathyReceiver operating characteristicF1 scoreComputer scienceMedicineDeep learningRetinalPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningOphthalmologyDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a federated learning framework for deep neural network-based retinal microvasculature segmentation and referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR) classification using OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA). Design: Retrospective analysis of clinical OCT and OCTA scans of control participants and patients with diabetes. Participants: The 153 OCTA en face images used for microvasculature segmentation were acquired from 4 OCT instruments with fields of view ranging from 2 × 2-mm to 6 × 6-mm. The 700 eyes used for RDR classification consisted of OCTA en face images and structural OCT projections acquired from 2 commercial OCT systems. Methods: OCT angiography images used for microvasculature segmentation were delineated manually and verified by retina experts. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity was evaluated by retinal specialists and was condensed into 2 classes: non-RDR and RDR. The federated learning configuration was demonstrated via simulation using 4 clients for microvasculature segmentation and was compared with other collaborative training methods. Subsequently, federated learning was applied over multiple institutions for RDR classification and was compared with models trained and tested on data from the same institution (internal models) and different institutions (external models). Main Outcome Measures: For microvasculature segmentation, we measured the accuracy and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). For severity classification, we measured accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve, balanced accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For both applications, federated learning achieved similar performance as internal models. Specifically, for microvasculature segmentation, the federated learning model achieved similar performance (mean DSC across all test sets, 0.793) as models trained on a fully centralized dataset (mean DSC, 0.807). For RDR classification, federated learning achieved a mean AUROC of 0.954 and 0.960; the internal models attained a mean AUROC of 0.956 and 0.973. Similar results are reflected in the other calculated evaluation metrics. Conclusions: Federated learning showed similar results to traditional deep learning in both applications of segmentation and classification, while maintaining data privacy. Evaluation metrics highlight the potential of collaborative learning for increasing domain diversity and the generalizability of models used for the classification of OCT data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmology ScienceSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207