MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206472875 · doi:10.4000/cei.9640

Figure femminili di santità nella Commedia di Dante

2021· article· it· W3206472875 on OpenAlexaff
Giuseppe Ledda

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d’études italiennes · 2021
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’articolo passa in rassegna le sante e le beate citate nella Commedia di Dante. Un rilievo strutturale molto forte hanno, oltre ovviamente a Beatrice, la Vergine Maria e santa Lucia. Dopo aver promosso il soccorso di Dante, Maria è molto citata nel Purgatorio, sia come soccorritrice a cui rivolgere preghiere sia come esempio supremo di ogni virtù. Lucia continua a svolgere invece un diretto ruolo strutturale. Altre figure femminili sono presenti, con varie modalità e funzioni, negli esempi del Purgatorio. Nel Paradiso le donne beate sono incontrate solo nel primo e nel terzo cielo, ma poi sono numerose e significative le presenze femminili nell’Empireo. Inoltre assumono ancora un valore speciale, come a incorniciare la cantica, le figure di santa Chiara e di santa Lucia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d’études italiennesSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207