MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206543540 · doi:10.1080/23293691.2021.1973844

Failure to Feed: Women’s Experiences of Breastfeeding and the Implications for Health Promotion Practice

2021· article· en· W3206543540 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Lauren N. Harrison, Alexandra Chin, Elena Neiterman

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen s Reproductive Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBreastfeedingDisappointmentPrideHealth promotionFeelingPublic healthMedicineNursingPromotion (chess)PsychologyQualitative researchBreastfeeding promotionSocial psychologyPolitical scienceSociologyPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breastfeeding has been recognized as an ideal nutrition source for infants and has become a priority in public health. Here we explore women’s experiences of breastfeeding and contextualize them within the current public health discourse. Data from 37 qualitative interviews with Canadian women show that, whereas successful breastfeeding can be a source of pride, unsuccessful attempts to breastfeed prompt mothers to experience negative emotions and feelings of personal failure. Results suggest that there is a need to change the health promotion discourse, to acknowledge that unsuccessful breastfeeding is possible, and to offer women various supports to deal with the disappointment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen s Reproductive HealthSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207