MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206590409 · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2025.07.009

Exploring the affinity and selectivity of sedimentary mackinawite (FeS) towards natural organic matter

2025· article· en· W3206590409 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kathryn Balind, Milad Ezzati, Aude Picard, Yves Gélinas

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchConcordia UniversityCanada Foundation for InnovationGovernment of SaskatchewanAdvanced Light SourceOffice of ScienceUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsMackinawiteChemistryAnoxic watersEnvironmental chemistryIron sulfideSulfideOrganic matterSulfurPyriteGreigiteFerrousSedimentary organic matterBiogeochemical cycleInorganic chemistryGeologyTotal organic carbonMineralogyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While iron oxides have been thoroughly explored in terms of their ability to sorb and sequester organic carbon (OC) in sediments, the role of iron sulfide (Fe-S) minerals in the long-term sequestration of OC remains poorly defined. In this study, we assessed the affinity of different types of natural organic matter (NOM) towards synthetic Fe-S minerals using sorption isotherms. We found affinities and sorption capacities varying in the following order: plankton NOM > corn leaves NOM > aged terrestrial NOM. Scanning electron microscopy showed that NOM increases the size and surface area of Fe-S aggregates, likely also influencing their surface reactivity. High NOM contents in Fe-S minerals protected Fe(II) from oxidation after exposure to atmospheric oxygen. Analysis of the synthetically prepared Fe-S-NOM complexes by synchrotron scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) coupled to near-edge X-ray absorption fine-edge structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy revealed strong interactions between Fe-S minerals and NOM extracted from plankton, specifically with amide and carboxylic functional groups. We also attempted to identify and characterize interactions between OC and Fe-S minerals in natural sulfidic sediments from the St. Lawrence Estuary and the Saguenay Fjord, hence linking our work on synthetic iron sulfides to what is occurring in natural environments, although this effort proved more challenging owing to the presence of Fe(III) minerals even at depth and the difficulty in distinguishing FeS from other Fe(II) minerals. We present depth concentration profiles of dissolved OC, iron, and sulfur in the liquid-phase (pore water) along with speciation data from sequential extractions of sulfur in the solid-phase collected from sediment cores. We found a clear association between mixed Fe(II)/Fe(III) minerals and OC in sediments, which, combined with the results of the synthetic FeS experiment, suggests that Fe-S minerals can promote OC sequestration in sediments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochimica et Cosmochimica ActaSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207