MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206708024 · doi:10.1080/02664763.2021.1987400

A novel group VIF regression for group variable selection with application to multiple change-point detection

2021· article· en· W3206708024 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Statistics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGroup selectionGroup (periodic table)Feature selectionVariance inflation factorComputer scienceData setVariable (mathematics)Selection (genetic algorithm)Set (abstract data type)Linear regressionMathematicsAlgorithmData miningArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel group variance inflation factor (VIF) regression model for tackling large data sets where data follows a grouped structure. Unlike classical penalized methods, this approach can perform group variable selection in a sparse model, which is quite different from the classical penalized methods. We further adapt the proposed method associated with a two-stage procedure for detecting multiple change-point in linear models. We carry out extensive simulation studies to show that the proposed group variable selection and change-point detection methods are stable and efficient. Finally, we provide two real data examples, including a body fat data set and an air pollution data set, to illustrate the performance of our algorithms in group selection and change-point detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it